Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. Performs 5.9x better in floating-point computations. Shows significantly better (up to 62%) AnTuTu 10 score – 236K vs 146K. Higher GPU frequency (~46%) Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 11.92 GB/s) Announced 11-months later. Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 12 nm)
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G95 (Mali-G76 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 11 nm) Announced 2-years and 7-months later. Shows better (up to 36%) AnTuTu 10 score – 311K vs 230K. 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz) Higher GPU frequency (~17%) Performs 17% better in floating-point computations. Mediatek Helio G99 vs Mediatek Helio G90T - Benchmarks, Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. 0.4915 -14%. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. 0.4949 -13%. Qualcomm Snapdragon 660. 0.516 -10%. Mediatek Helio P70.
8. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking. Uses big.LITTLE technology. MediaTek Helio G85. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to